Quality
In 2022, Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) received an initial sum of € 16.502 million (1) in the context of the Higher Education Quality Agreements (HOKA).
These Quality Agreements contribute to the elaboration of the themes of the quality and innovation calendar drawn up by EUR in 2019 to further improve the quality of education.
The themes are:
- strengthening the innovation capacity and professionalism of lecturers (OC&W themes 4 and 6);
- improving the wellbeing and personal and professional development of students (OC&W themes 1 and 2);
- implementing education that enables students to learn to understand complicated and complex problems based on realistic issues in the outside world (impact-driven learning, OC&W theme 4);
- improving online education – driven in part by the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic (OC&W themes 4 and 5).
The EUR Community for Learning and Innovation (CLI) supports the faculties in the profession development of lecturers and online education (OC&W themes 4 and 5). The Erasmus X programme boosts innovation to further improve the quality of education. This section provides information on spending and progress in the year 2022.
[1] In the government grant letter, € 470,000 is added for market share and price level adjustment.
Financial accountability 2022
Table 3 shows spending based on the themes identified by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OC&W) in the Framework Regulation on Quality Agreements. There was a slight underspend (15%) relative to the allocated resources. This was due to investments made within the theme of educational differentiation. These investments remained the same as in 2021. The increased allocated resources were not fully utilised, mainly because the theme ‘impact learning’ set aside resources for the scaling up of this education from 2023. The resources were otherwise spent according to the budget.
Summary of investments in Quality Agreements per theme in 2022, x € 1,000.
table 3
OC&W theme | Actual 2021 | Budget 2022 | Actual 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 Small-scale and intensive | 3.935 | 4.178 | 4.054 |
2 More and better guidance | 3.169 | 2.704 | 2.632 |
3 Academic success | 32 | 0 | 0 |
4 Differentiation | 6.162 | 7.472 | 6.338 |
5 Facilities | 145 | 248 | 274 |
6 Professionalisation/quality of lecturers | 538 | 638 | 688 |
Still to be distributed | 1.261 | 0 | |
13.982 | 16.502 | 13.987 |
EUR uses different theme descriptions internally to those used in the regulations drawn up by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science in 2018. The reason is that the EUR terms more accurately describe the university’s ambitions in relation to improving the quality of education. The link to the OC&W theme is always stated.
Table 4 shows spending according to EUR’s chosen themes. A description of the themes and the progress made in 2022 can be found later in the notes on the content. The reduction for the theme of Innovation Capacity is due to the completion of training activities in this area by the faculties.
Summary of investments per theme at EUR in 2022, x € 1,000.
table 4
EUR theme | Actual 2021 | Budget 2022 | Actual 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 Personal Professional Development | 3.805 | 3.765 | 3.996 |
2 Innovation Capacity | 3.771 | 3.635 | 2.836 |
3 Personal Learning Online Facilities | 2.654 | 2.709 | 2.288 |
4 Student Wellbeing | 480 | 440 | 508 |
5 Impact at the Core | 923 | 1.430 | 1.050 |
6 Innovative Space | 1.006 | 1.350 | 1.264 |
7 CLI | 1.343 | 2.000 | 2.045 |
Still to be distributed | 1.172 | ||
Grand Total | 13.982 | 16.502 | 13.987 |
Table 5 gives a summary of spending per faculty. ESHCC and the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences/Erasmus MC will be entering a second investment period with effect from the 2023-2024 academic year. They will consult with the participation bodies in early 2023 on the programmes and projects that will potentially be implemented over the next year. This explains the underspending in 2023. The ESE underspend is due to difficulties attracting new staff.
Summary of investments per faculty at EUR in 2022, x € 1,000.
table 5
Actual 2021 | Budget 2022 | Actual 2022 | Forecast for 2023 | Forecast for 2024 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGG/EMC | 1.727 | 1.547 | 773 | 2.586 | 760 | |
ESE | 1.787 | 2.267 | 1.777 | 2.838 | 3.135 | |
ESHPM | 353 | 340 | 439 | 429 | 538 | |
ESL | 1.818 | 1.786 | 1.587 | 2.128 | 1.971 | |
ESSB incl. EUC | 1.919 | 1.484 | 1.990 | 2.278 | 2.358 | |
ESHCC | 445 | 490 | 361 | 518 | 518 | |
RSM | 1.914 | 1.911 | 1.919 | 2.442 | 2.446 | |
ESPhil | 266 | 251 | 273 | 303 | 332 | |
Grand Total | 10.229 | 10.076 | 9.120 | 13.522 | 12.058 |
Table 6 gives a summary of spending at central university level that supports the faculties. The underspend in relation to the Impact at the Core programme is due to the setting aside of funds to strengthen teaching in impact learning in the coming years.
Summary of investments in central programmes at EUR in 2022, x € 1,000.
table 6
Actual 2021 | Budget 2022 | Actual 2022 | ∆ Actual vs budget | % Actual vs Budget | forecast for 2023 | forecast for 2024 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovative Space | 1.006 | 1.261 | 1.264 | 3 | 0% | 1.300 | 1.198 | |
Impact at the Core | 923 | 1.430 | 1.050 | -380 | -27% | 1.268 | 1.440 | |
Student Wellbeing | 480 | 440 | 508 | 68 | 15% | 415 | 440 | |
CLI | 1.343 | 2.000 | 2.045 | 45 | 2% | 2.930 | 2.930 | |
Still to be distributed | 1.291 | -1.291 | ||||||
Grand Total | 3.752 | 6.426 | 4.867 | -1.559 | 5.913 | 6.008 |
Midterm evaluation of the education quality and innovation calendar
The plans for the Quality Agreements are set out in the quality and innovation calendar. The main changes are as follows:
Follow-up of midterm evaluation
Due to continuous improvements in the implementation of the quality and innovation calendar, a broad midterm evaluation was completed at the start of 2022. More than two hundred representatives from the academic community took part in a discussion on this evaluation. The evaluation led to a number of specific recommendations to further optimise the quality of education. This optimisation took place in the first half of 2022 in the form of three university-wide dialogues with the following themes: 1. How do EUR’s values foster students’ personal development? 2. How is this reflected in a more focused vision of impact-driven learning? 3. How can we translate the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic into better online education?
Additional resources for faculties and the central programmes from 2023
EUR had a higher student intake over the period 2019 to 2022. This means that more resources also became available to improve the quality of education. Following a calculation of the remaining resources based on the increased student numbers, the Executive Board assigned these additional resources to the faculties in the second quarter of 2022 for the period 2023 and 2024. The extra funds will enable the faculties to take additional measures in 2023 and 2024 with the approval of the participation bodies. The faculties discussed possible focus areas in May 2022. The majority of the faculties had finalised their new plans by mid September 2022. These plans have been discussed and, in some cases, jointly developed with the participation bodies. The faculty participation bodies approved the spending at the end of 2022. Reporting will take place from 2023.
Additional resources will also become available for the central programmes. Broad coordination took place between September and December 2022 on the tightening up of themes in the presence of the University Council. The result was three dialogue reports that will be used to tighten up the educational vision in 2023. Themes will be earmarked for additional investment in consultation with the University Council.
Acceleration of online learning by the CLI
Back in 2021, resources were earmarked through the ‘EU_online’ project to improve the quality of online education. This online education is in the design phase and lecturers are working on the associated teaching. A social environment is also being created for students who attend education entirely or largely online due to circumstances.
Vision of impact-driven education: prelude to scaling up
The midterm evaluation revealed a strong need to equip students with the skills to adopt an academic approach to complex, realistic challenges. There will be greater scope in the third year of the Bachelor’s programmes and in the Master’s programmes for students to work on realistic case studies with partners from both inside and outside the university.
Student wellbeing manifesto: an increasing focus on student success
During the opening of the 2022-2023 academic year, Rector Magnificus Annelien Bredenoord and the vice-deans of education of all faculties signed a manifesto on student wellbeing. The manifesto sets out seven points to improve the wellbeing of all EUR students.
Student living room given a permanent home on campus
Following temporary accommodation, a new Living Room was opened in the new Langeveld Building. More than a hundred students visit the Living Room every day to relax or to obtain information on improving personal wellbeing.
Notes on the progress of the quality and innovation calendar (2019-2024)
To gain a better understanding of the results produced by the investments in 2022, a summary is given for each theme below.
Personal and Professional Development (OC&W themes 1 and 2)
The projects focus on more and better guidance in small groups of students in skills training.
The objectives for the period 2019-2024 are as follows:
- Skills courses are to focus on personal development and connection to the career/job market;
- Students are to be proactively provided with long-term additional guidance regardless of their background, origin and prior education;
- Plans are to focus on improving prevention and chain care, as well as making mental health issues more open to discussion among students.
Faculties draw up personal and professional development plans for students and implement them. Student wellbeing is a central programme that strengthens the overall wellbeing of students in collaboration with the faculties.
Changes compared with 2021
A large number of skills training programmes were developed in the period 2019-2021. The conclusion from the midterm evaluation in 2022 is that many skills training programmes focus on academic and learning skills and on labour market orientation. In future, a greater focus is needed on the student’s broader development in the context of impact-driven education.
The faculties completed a number of projects on the development of study and learning skills and labour market skills in 2022. These courses have been incorporated into the degree programmes, particularly the Bachelor’s programmes (ESHCC, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences/Erasmus MC, RSM, Esphil, ESL). Students are satisfied with the courses.
Projects aimed at broader competency development from the quality and innovation calendar were continued or even expanded. One example is RSM’s MentorMe programme, aimed at students’ overall personal and professional development. Another example is the ‘Enriching the learning experience’ project of
the Erasmus School of Philosophy, in which students broaden their development through study activities outside their degree programme.
Student Wellbeing in 2022 (OC&W theme 2)
An integral part of students’ personal development is the personal wellbeing of each student, regardless of their background or personal circumstances. The objectives are:
- To create an accessible, non-commercial space to get together in the form of a student living room (in the context of prevention);
- To improve information on student wellbeing in the form of a wellbeing platform (MyEur) where information is easy to find and where students have easy access to support;
- To professionalise the support structure for students;
- To collect data on student wellbeing (including through the student monitor).
Changes compared with 2021
All project plan objectives were met in 2022. And this has paid off: the 2022 student monitor seems to show a slight improvement in student wellbeing. The student living room is doing its job. A hundred students visit the living room each day, with around 18,000 visitors already since its opening.
The wellbeing platform web page had 42,000 page visits. The signature of a manifesto by the Rector Magnificus and the vice deans of all faculties marked an important step towards the next stage of the implementation plan. This next stage involves increasing the focus on student wellbeing within education.
Investing in lecturers’ innovation capacity (OC&W theme 6)
Lecturers’ innovation capacity is primarily supported by the CLI. The CLI has developed a range of courses for lecturers to help them improve the quality and innovation of their teaching. The courses offered by the CLI enable lecturers to continuously adapt to new and developing ideas about excellent teaching. The CLI’s short courses relate specifically to impact-driven education, new educational insights from academia and new technological and online capabilities.
Changes compared with 2021
All sub-objectives for 2022 have been met. A total of 378 lecturers took part in the portfolio of 21 short courses (microlabs) that have been developed since the start of the Quality Agreements. Since the introduction of the Regulation on Quality Agreements, 1,312 lecturers have followed a microlab on topics such as impact learning, teaching, online teaching and sustainability. Lecturers received even more direct support with their knowledge questions through webinars in 2022. A database of more than 56 teaching methods is now available in TeachEUR.
A second key tool of the CLI to enable lecturers to adopt an evidence-based approach to innovation is facilitating lecturers in the form of fellowships. Thirty fellows are now active on all themes of the EUR quality and innovation calendar. They exchange experiences in a Community of Practice. The Communities of Practice are an important tool of the CLI to engage with lecturers on their continuing development and what they need for this. The lecturers’ Community of Practice met on a regular basis.
Personal and Online Learning (OC&W themes 4 and 5)
Personal and online learning is about modernising the online learning environment for students, therefore more effectively challenging these students. Innovations enable students to: 1. learn in their own time off campus; 2. receive more and better feedback on the learning process; 3. adapt their teaching to specific learning questions. Faculties themselves place a strong focus on designing an online learning environment, however the role of the CLI as driver and developer is vital. The faculties and the CLI are also enhanced by the ‘out of the box’ experiments of Erasmus X: the innovation lab that develops initiatives in co-creation with students.
Changes compared with 2021
The CLI fulfilled all its commitments in the area of personal and online learning in 2022. The centre supported 43 applications from faculties, such as the request for Edubadges. These are certificates that students receive following an extra activity in areas such as impact learning. In the Edubadges project, the CLI experiments with flexible education principles in collaboration with all faculties. These will be important for students in the future.
Responsibility for the redesign of online education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic rests largely with the CLI. Four projects involving new technology for online and hybrid education were tested in 2022. One example is the E-portfolio project that monitors students’ personal and professional development. The CLI is also continuing to build on the development of online teaching and educational design as part of the EU-online programme.
As far as faculty projects are concerned, the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences/Erasmus MC completed three major online learning projects. The results will be used in the medicine training programmes. Investment in the online learning and assessment acceleration plan and improvement of the hybrid and online lecture halls remained unchanged. Commitment to the Personalised and Online Learning themes within ESHCC, RSM and Esphil remained unchanged. Erasmus School of Economics saw some growth in investment, however this did not result in any changes to the innovation projects on this theme.
Personal and Online Learning: acceleration through Erasmus X (OC&W theme 4)
Erasmus X initiates innovations that tackle problems using a different approach, aimed at better solutions. It also seeks to offer education in a more challenging and effective way. The radical innovation process used by Erasmus X means that not all innovations lead to implementation, however the projects carried out by Erasmus X in 2022 mainly show the broad impact Erasmus X has on students, lecturers and the learning experience within many faculties. As in the case of personalised and online learning, Erasmus X tests new approaches that give a boost to impact-driven learning. Last year, the driving force was the
Redefining the Classroom project. Redefining the Classroom builds a new way of learning in the community and does this with students, schools in the community and other partners. In the HefHouse, connections are established with young people in the community in collaboration with the municipality and Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences. Students from EUR and European partner cities also develop joint projects. Here, Erasmus University College students complete a placement in a non-profit or voluntary organisation together with Stichting Werkshop and students from Rotterdam School of Management. They use the HefHouse as a springboard to carry out projects that have societal impact. The approach is being developed in consultation with faculties and with Impact at the Core. In 2023, it will be explored whether and how Redefining the Classroom helps to scale up impact learning for all faculties.
Ace yourself App
EUR is committed to improving accessibility for students from secondary education. How can we boost the resilience of students who want to start at EUR and how can we increase their chances of success? Part of the solution lies in an app that helps students to improve their self-knowledge and their self-regulating and study skills, as well as helping prospective students to prepare for their studies. The functional design of this app was developed further together with forty partners in 2022. The app has not only attracted the interest of EUR and schools in the region, but will also be used by the universities of Tilburg and Maastricht.
Augmented University
How do you design a digital university that better supports large groups of students during the start of their studies? This question is relevant due to the scale of a university and the wide range of digital and other platforms on which information is shared with students. Digital is convenient because, nowadays, not everything can be done face-to-face. Online facilities are also much more accessible than a physical service desk.
The development resulted in the ‘Augmented University’ project. Following research, an app was designed in collaboration with Erasmus School of Law that supports students at the start of their studies and helps them to find better information on their studies. A group of 608 students tested the app. Research showed that students who used the app were better informed and felt better informed than other students. Erasmus School of Law therefore decided to fully integrate the app in the faculty. The app was introduced for all students at Erasmus School of Law at the start of the new academic year. Three quarters of the students downloaded the app. The app was also introduced within the new faculties (ESSB, ISS).
Online Virtual Campus
How can you challenge students in new ways to use their knowledge to solve joint problems? In 2020, Erasmus X developed a virtual campus during the COVID-19 pandemic that won the prestigious ‘best class award’. This virtual campus was also developed further in 2022. Courses have been developed and implemented at Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus School of History and Communication and Rotterdam School of Management. The essence of the innovation is that students are challenged in online and gamified learning environments to use their knowledge to solve problems. The basic principle is that students lean how to apply their knowledge in this type of learning environment. The environment is used by large groups of students. For example, 1,500 students used it on one course at Erasmus School of Law.
Impact-driven learning (OC&W theme 4)
EUR’s goal is to ensure that its education and research helps to create positive impact on important and complex challenges. Impact at the Core started in 2020. The programme focuses on the development of impact-driven education. The aim is to offer every EUR student on every programme at least one educational opportunity to work with direct stakeholders from outside the university to tackle societal and/or transition issues. The intention is also to design a feasible and affordable teaching model. Lecturers need to be adequately supported by tools that facilitate collaboration with the outside world. One example is a stakeholder management system.
Redesigned courses compared with 2021
A total of 31 courses were redesigned last year. Experiences were summarised, discussed and used to produce a design that can be used for teaching in all programmes. The teaching will be offered to all students in the coming years. A number of things were therefore developed in 2022:
- A shared vision of impact learning supported by all faculties;
- A teaching framework that describes the tasks and roles of lecturers and partners from outside the university, aimed specifically at the last year of the Bachelor’s programme;
- A pilot in a minor (Impact Space) that tested and evaluated the teaching framework. It has been found to be useful for students, stakeholders and lecturers;
- A pilot of a digital tool that helps lecturers to organise contact with stakeholders in assignments that are attractive for students. The tool has been implemented within Erasmus School of Law and can be used by other faculties;
- A collaboration with the higher education institutions in Rotterdam and the municipality in relation to energy transition and resilience;
- An interdisciplinary Master’s programme at Erasmus School of Philosophy that can serve as a blueprint for the development of impact-driven education in the Master’s portfolio;
- An experimental and impact-driven education model within Rotterdam School of Management; various courses at Erasmus School of Law involving impact-driven education;
- The further development of education for honours students at Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Science and Vital Cities, Vital Citizens.
Findings of the Supervisory Board and University Council
Findings of the Supervisory Board
The Quality Committee of the Supervisory Board takes note of the measures taken that serve to strengthen the quality of education in the context of the Quality Agreements. It also takes note of how the resources available in the context of the National Programme for Education are deployed. It feels well informed and is pleased to see that Erasmus University Rotterdam is taking positive steps to improve student success and student wellbeing as well as the quality of education offered to students.
Quality Agreements
In 2022, the Quality Committee was involved in the completion of the midterm evaluation of the programmes and initiatives carried out on the basis of the Quality Agreements. It took note of the results of the measures aimed at student wellbeing in the context of the National Programme for Education. The Quality Committee received extensive information about the progress and interim results of all programmes involved and received information on the realisation of the projects in 2022 ahead of the annual reports.
The Quality Committee took note of the recommendations made by the midterm evaluation committee’s panel. The panel of peers recommended further improving consistency in the implementation of impact-driven education and establishing a clearer link to the Erasmian Values. The Quality Committee is confident that this consistency will be achieved through the reformulation of a coherent educational vision, which the university started in the second half in 2022. To this end, three dialogues were organised with a broad representation of students, lecturers, staff and representatives of the participation bodies. The faculty leaders held in-depth discussions on the significance of the Erasmian values and impact-driven education. The Quality Committee sees these dialogues as confirmation of the panel’s observation that there is a solid culture of quality within Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Faculties are getting better at determining shared principles for education and the quality of education. The Quality Committee is pleased to hear that the University Council also feels more closely involved.
In addition, the Quality Committee has identified points for improvement that need to be addressed in the coming period. This concerns the recommendation made by the midterm review panel to gain a better understanding of the actual impact of the various projects for students and lecturers in the here and now. A second important point to consider is the further structuring of the quality assurance system. The report of the midterm committee stated that the quality assurance system has not undergone a performance review. The Quality Committee is confident that this item will be addressed in 2023, also in conjunction with the implementation of the adopted educational vision.
National Programme for Education
The Quality Committee was briefed on the budget planning for NPO funds, specifically focused on student wellbeing, student intake and advancement, and the progress of research for scholars with temporary appointments. The resources have helped to improve the social binding and cohesion of
students, to raise awareness of students’ mental wellbeing and to expand facilities for students who need them. The Quality Committee is confident that the lessons learned will play a role in improving student intake and advancement as well as student wellbeing.
Findings of the University Council
This document serves as a summary reflection of the HOKA Work Group of the University Council (UR) regarding the developments of the HOKA investments in the past year. This reflection has been drawn up in the context of the Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) 2022 Annual Report and forms part of the evaluation of the Quality Agreements at EUR. It is important to note that this document was written by the current members of the HOKA Work Group of the University Council. A number of these members started working on HOKA-related themes in the academic year 2022-2023. This means that they were not present for the drafting and establishment of the original HOKA-related plans nor for the first two quarters of 2022.
This reflection document is structured in a number of sections. Firstly, a general summary is provided of the HOKA-related investments. Secondly, a description is given of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the central HOKA projects (Student Wellbeing, Impact at the Core, Erasmus X, and Center for Learning and Innovation). Thirdly, conclusions and recommendations on the HOKA project are given on behalf of the HOKA Work Group.
General overview of HOKA investments from the HOKA Work Group
The HOKA Work Group has set out a number of advantages and disadvantages of the current performance of the HOKA investments. In terms of advantages, the HOKA Work Group noted that there is positive and proactive cooperation with the various representatives and policymakers for each project. One of the guiding principles is that all members contribute to the development and functioning of the projects by means of consistent and regular meetings. This ensures that the views of the University Council are incorporated at an early stage and also taken into account in the final decision-making stages of the HOKA projects, from both a co-creation and financing perspective. The HOKA projects also offer scope for collaboration between different faculties. This expands the options for interdisciplinarity within EUR, in line with EUR’s educational vision.
In addition, the HOKA projects are increasingly being implemented in skills courses within Bachelor’s programmes. This is positive because a large proportion of the student population will benefit from access to these innovations and from the continuation of these projects after the HOKA investment scheme through a more centrally financed scheme.
However, the HOKA investments also present a number of challenges and weaknesses. There are still many bureaucratic requirements to be met, which have a negative impact on the time needed to launch projects. This brings us to the second downside, namely that members of the University Council found that various projects financed by HOKA have less of an impact for current students and will probably not be implemented or produce benefit until later years.
From the University Council’s perspective, the monitoring of HOKA can also be confusing. Since the HOKA plans were drawn up four years ago, and since the composition of the consultative bodies changes every year or every two years, there is a risk of lack of continuity in supervision of the project’s progress. The activities in the 2022-2023 academic year got off to a slow start with some delay, largely due to confusion about the activities required by the HOKA consultative bodies.
In addition, EUR places a strong focus on sustainability in its values. For this reason, the HOKA Work Group would like to see a greater emphasis on sustainability within the HOKA projects in the context of the EUR values.
Finally, the members of the University Council point out that there is a lack of appropriate measures when it comes to the impact of HOKA projects on education and the current student population. More specifically, it is difficult to assess whether their benefits extend beyond the satisfaction of the students who have put forward these projects.
Central EUR HOKA projects
Student Wellbeing
The Student Wellbeing project made significant progress with its sub-projects. For example, the Living Room and the Personal Support Hub were given permanent sites on campus in a central location on the ground floor of the recently opened Langeveld Building. The Living Room has thus succeeded in attracting a large number of students. Following the signature of the Student Wellbeing Manifesto by the Rector Magnificus and the vice-deans of education, we also look forward with anticipation the developments within the Student Wellbeing project as a result of the decision.
The representatives of the HOKA Work Group get together around twice a month with the Student Wellbeing project team and are satisfied with this team. Communication is clear, they are kept sufficiently up to date with the projects and receive satisfactory answers to questions. The representatives feel that their input and feedback is highly valued.
Impact at the Core
The Impact at the Core project has undergone further improvement in the past year. A large number of courses were implemented last year that contributed to high-impact education. The sub-projects developed in 2022 are mainly aimed at third-year Bachelor’s students, particularly in the minors. We are witnessing the benefits of the development of curricula thanks to the efforts of Impact at the Core, but it is also noticeable that these sub-projects have a limited impact on the student population. This is because the number of students who follow a minor is small. It is important to also state here, however, that preparations have already been made to scale up the activities in 2023 so that more students can be reached. Moreover, the project team has been very active in promoting the theme of impact on the broader EUR community through other activities, such as Impact Week.
The representatives of the HOKA Work Group meet with the Impact at the Core project team around twice a month to discuss various aspects of the project. During the discussions, we always have sufficient scope to ask critical questions, express opinions and put forward ideas. In the course of the discussions, links are also often made to other developments at the university, such as
the Convergence (collaboration between EUR, the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences/Erasmus MC and TU Delft). This is important for reasons of efficiency and effectiveness.
Erasmus X
The Erasmus X project is going well and marked improvements have been made compared with previous years. The University Council is aware that the progress must be viewed from the perspective of the nature of the project. A number of projects have failed, however many projects have succeeded in achieving innovative education for many students. One example is the positive results achieved with the Ace Your Self-Study app, which has proven beneficial for first-year students. Another is the development of a new stage of the Online Virtual Campus, resulting in innovative education for a large number of students.
The representatives of the HOKA Work Group consult with the Erasmus X project team around twice a month and are satisfied with the project team due to their willingness to provide us with the necessary information and the fact that they are open to critical questions from our side. Communication did not always go smoothly at the start of the academic year. The Work Group acknowledges that this was due in part to staffing changes within Erasmus X. Later in the year, there was also some delay in the submission of the budgets to the HOKA Work Group. We wish to emphasise the importance of avoiding such delays in future, mainly because it takes time to properly assess the budget.
However, there is not yet any indication as to how the success of these projects will be measured. The University Council also feels that supervision of Erasmus X is lacking in terms of implementation of the projects. The project team is not deemed responsible for project implementation and it is sometimes impossible to integrate projects into curricula due to this lack of supervision. This is worrying as it means that money and efforts dedicated to the development of innovative projects are lost during the implementation phase.
Center for Learning and Innovation
This year, the HOKA Work Group worked in closer collaboration with the Center for Learning and Innovation (CLI) project team. We are satisfied with the efforts of the CLI team to provide us with feedback and to involve us in the discussions and decision making on their projects. The representatives of the HOKA Work Group had a number of separate meetings with the CLI project team in 2022. However, we appreciate that we need to make more effort by attending these joint meetings more frequently and maintaining closer contact with the CLI project team.
The University Council is also satisfied with the development of the CLI sub-projects, such as the Edubadges. This project specifically supports interdisciplinarity and flexible education within EUR. In addition, the projects aimed at online learning have contributed to the education of students who have been unable to attend classes in person. The projects are therefore in line with the University Council’s values of accessibility and flexibility.
Recommendations
The university needs to offer timely and systematic training or onboarding for new members of the HOKA consultative bodies.
Systematic academic research is needed that specifically focuses on the impact of HOKA projects on the quality of education, as well as on the extent to which current students benefit from these projects.
The university needs to facilitate supervision of project implementation, specifically in relation to Erasmus X, to ensure that the efforts put into innovative projects are subsequently also incorporated into curricula within faculties.
SPOTLIGHT
Education and transitions in Rotterdam
Positive impact is a key element of EUR’s strategy. Society is facing major challenges and EUR wants to be at the heart of society and therefore take on these challenges. That is why we organised an Education Impact Dialogue with the leaders of the municipality of Rotterdam and the university in the autumn. The central question: how can education help to shape transitions in Rotterdam?